I.
Current Events and Why We
Should Care
Sectarian unrest between the ruling Shia
majority and the Sunni minority in Iraq continues. Suicide and/or car bombings
are a daily occurrence in Iraqi provinces. Past weeks have proven to be no
exception, with several deadly attacks occurring throughout the country. On
March 29, bombs at five different Iraqi Shi’ite mosques killed 19. On April 5,
two separate car bombing attacks occurred in Shia-dominated neighborhoods, killing three Iraqi soldiers and
three civilians. And perhaps most importantly in this seemingly neverending
string of violence, on April 6, a suicide bomber attacked a gathering of Sunni candidates
campaigning for the April 20 elections. The attack killed 22 civilians. Similar
attacks have occurred at election campaign tents, with a majority of the ten
candidates killed previously belonging to the Sunni-backed bloc previously led
by a secular Shi’ite politician.
We should care about these events for
three reasons. First, both Sunnis and Shias are attacking each other using acts
of terrorism. Second, violence and unrest are high in Western provinces. This
is important as the government worries that the Syrian conflict may be
spilling into Iraq, where Sunni rebels are fighting a Shia-backed regime. Third, the April 6 attack directly targeted Sunnis that would present a challenge to the current leadership.
II.
Analysis of Acts of Terrorism
Based on this past week’s discussions in
class, it appears that these events all qualify as acts of terrorism. Terrorism
must be a public act and elicit fear, which is evident by the use of bombings
in mosques and market places where innocent citizens are likely to be gathered.
Further, both the identity of the attacker and the target matters. Evident from
the current events discussed above, Sunnis are directly targeting Shias and
vice versa. Attrition is also in play. Minority Sunnis target Shia
neighborhoods to display that while they may be small in number, they have the
ability to impose great costs. Al-Jazeera reports that Sunnis do in fact attack
Shias regularly in order to undermine Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki’s regime.
Shia Muslims react to Sunni-led attacks. Photo Courtesy Al-Jazeera. |
Also discussed in class, much of the literature
devoted to studying terrorism claims that high poverty and low education are
influential in determining whether groups will resort to acts of terrorism. While
a recent Gallup Poll noted that 55% of the Iraqi population feel that jobs and
unemployment have gotten worse as a result of U.S. withdrawal in 2011, it also notes that Sunnis are more likely to see the country as
worse off compared to Shias. The Gallup Poll notes 73% of Sunnis feel
jobs and unemployment have worsened, compared to 60% in Shia communities. In
their article, Education, Poverty and
Terrorism: Is There a Causal Connection?, Krueger and Maleckova find that
acts of terrorism are “more accurately viewed as a response to political
conditions and long-standing feelings of indignity and frustration that have
little to do with economics.” Therefore, it is important to look more closely
at the political conditions Sunnis face under the current leadership.
Image Courtesy Gallup.com |
Image Courtesy Gallup.com |
Sunnis feel marginalized by the policies
of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki. In December 2012, Iraqi troops detained Sunni Finance
Minister Rafa al-Essawi. The April 5 suicide bombing directly targeted the
campaign tent of a Sunni candidate and the April 20 elections have already been
postponed in two Sunni-dominated provinces. Further, Sunnis are frequently
imprisoned on charges of terrorism. An Amnesty International Report recently
detailed human rights abuses committed by security forces in numerous Iraqi
prisons. Sunni prisoners are detained on charges of terrorism and beaten, raped, and
tortured to confess to crimes they have not committed. Many prisoners receive
death sentences for their supposed crimes, with 129 hanged in 2012 after unfair
trials. This is characteristic of Iraqi life since the U.S. withdrawal in 2011.
So what should Sunnis do next?
Sunni prisoners in one of "Maliki's prisons." Photo Courtesy Al-Jazeera. |
III.
Advice to Policy Makers and
Protestors
It is clear that Sunnis have responded
to these incidents with acts of terrorism, as seen in the March 29 attacks on Shi’ite
mosques and the April 5 car bombings in Shia neighborhoods. In
addition, Sunnis have held peaceful protests in Fallujah, a Sunni-dominated
province, for three months. They are protesting for changes in both the regime
and the constitution. However, one protest leader told Al-Jazeera that many
protestors are withdrawing their demands due to a lack of response from Maliki’s
government. The protest leader stated that if the government continued to ignore the
demands of protestors, that “maybe armed struggle comes next.”
Whether protestors choose to remain
peaceful or join more extremist groups that resort to acts of terrorism and
violence, moving forward I would advise Sunnis to develop more coherent and
detailed demands. In his article, Are Terrorists Really Strategic?, Abrahms argues that acts of terrorism are not strategic and
therefore will prove unsuccessful. He claims that terrorists reject compromises
and posses protean political platforms. For example, Al-Qaeda frequently claims
responsibility for suicide and car bombings that target Shias and plague the country daily, but
their demand for global Jihad and a strict interpretation of sharia law is not
only vague, but also unreasonable. Sunnis would find more success if they
developed more realistic goals. Peaceful protestors must also be more explicit in their demands. What do changes in regime and the constitution look like? Further, as Abrahms argues, groups
would find greater success if they pooled their resources. While it seems
unlikely that Al-Qaeda will develop a less extreme approach, I believe that
Sunnis will find success only by developing more reasonable demands and working
together against the Shia government. Further, if the Shia government
wants to end the protests, they too must abandon an unrealistic political platform
that rejects any Sunni involvement in government.
Sources:
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/04/06/us-iraq-violence-idUSBRE93503U20130406
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/03/29/us-iraq-violence-idUSBRE92S07420130329
http://www.aljazeera.com/news/middleeast/2013/04/201346105421548197.html
http://www.aljazeera.com/humanrights/2013/03/201331883513244683.html
http://www.aljazeera.com/news/middleeast/2013/04/20134512256672561.html
http://www.gallup.com/poll/161312/iraqis-say-security-better-result-withdrawal.aspx
Krueger Alan and Jitka Maleckova. "Education, Poverty, Political Violence and Terrorism: Is There a Causal Connection?" Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2003, v17(4, Fall). 119-144.
Class Notes: Choosing Tactics; April 1, 2013.
Now that U.S. forces are gone, Iraq's ruling Shiites are moving quickly to keep the two Muslim sects separate,and unequal for that matter. Without the U.S. to play peacekeeper, I think the development of Sunni-ruled areas could lead to a potential breakup of the country. This once armed conflict and sectarian war has moved to a soft conflict fought in the state institutions and on the streets. It will be interesting to see how this conflict plays out and if it will lead to another dictatorship or a divide within the country..
ReplyDelete